![]() It does most of the tricks the more expensive models can do, like the Polar Fitness Test, which estimates your VO2 max levels, and even tells you your Running Index, which is a measurement of how well you run. Because if you aren't a serious runner, you can get a Fitbit Versa for cheaper than the Polar M430, and the former looks less like an oversized fitness tracker, whilst still tracking all the basic fitness metrics.īut in case you are an avid runner and would like to own a running watch that clearly communicates to others around you that run often, you should definitely choose the Polar M430. The Polar M430 is geared towards serious runners. But the lack of updates since the Ignite is a bit disappointing, not to mention the increased competition, which makes me wonder how many people will actually choose the Polar Ignite 2 over its competitors. The training tools are good, the sensors are not too bad, and the smart features are also okay. We recommended the original Ignite, and since the Ignite 2 is very similar, we guess we can also recommend the new watch. ![]() Would we recommend the Polar Ignite 2? Well, yes and no. For the Ignite 2's price, you can also get a Fitbit Versa 3 or a Garmin Venu Sq (or Sq Music), both being either more popular or more capable than the Ignite 2. On the other hand, it fails to offer anything new, so we wonder what the point of re-releasing the same watch two years later was.Įven more strangely, Polar already has a similar watch on the market: the Polar Unite, a fitness watch that looks the same, is a bit cheaper and less competent but serves its purpose just fine. To some degree, it’s still a perfectly adequate fitness wearable and very similar to the Polar Ignite, a watch we really liked. It’s hard to summarise what's not quite right with the Polar Ignite 2. Watch feels less premium than similarly priced fitness watches such as the Fitbit Versa 3 How does the Vantage M2 compare against the Vantage V2? We compared the two here: Polar Vantage M2 vs Vantage V2. However, you'll find a clever multisport watch under the hood that can effectively help you get better in whatever sport you practice. To clarify, it isn't one, but Polar is undoubtedly trying to make the Vantage M2 more appealing to smartwatch users by offering specific colour variants (looking at you, Champagne/Gold Vantage M2). ![]() Is there a reason why you shouldn't get the Polar Vantage M2? Admittedly, if you need a hardcore running watch, you might find the Vantage M2 a tad too fashion-watch-like. Although fitness wearables are never an investment, I reckon the Vantage M2 will serve its users well for at least a good few years. The Polar Vantage M2 strikes a good balance between style and substance: it has an ample amount of features, both sport and casual, and despite all the premium features it has to offer, it doesn't cost the earth either. How does Garmin's top dog outdoor watch compare to Polar's most expensive wearable? Find out here: Polar Vantage V2 vs Garmin Fenix 6 Pro. We would certainly recommend the Polar Vantage V2 to anyone who would like to take their athletic performance to the next level: there aren't many wrist-wearables that provide as much data as this one. It would have been great to see some improvements to the user interface, especially the navigation, since the Vantage V, but what can we do? Touch controls are still a bit laggy, although the screen feels a bit more responsive than the one found on the Vantage V. Better still, most of the tests and data provided by the Vantage V2 can't be found elsewhere, making the watch all the more appealing for information-thirsty athletes. It has loads of useful tests and data for serious runners, cyclists and triathletes to better their form and get ready for races more efficiently. Its built quality is excellent, and a step up from the original Vantage V. The Polar Vantage V2 is a watch of many qualities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |